🔗 Share this article

Turns out the manager was able to withstand losing against Grimsby. Survive an important continental showpiece against a particularly poor Spurs sides in living memory. He withstood home defeats against West Ham and Wolves, a lowly league position, the tactical inflexibility, laying waste to the team's best academy products, a poor winning percentage, labeling his team the worst in Manchester United history. Yet, there existed one adversary against whom Ruben Amorim was not permitted to dance. You come at Jason Wilcox, you had better succeed.

Regrettably, like many a top-flight right-back during Blackburn Rovers' title-winning campaign, the coach came at the executive and seems to have failed. The most casual observer can see the irony here: a manager who often railed his squad for failing in individual battles succumbing in the face of the white heat and animal charisma of a England's top division's most intimidating football executives.

And frankly, this entire painful saga seems to paint the director in a different perspective. It may have been tempting, given his nine months of experience at Southampton, to regard Jason Wilcox as merely a drudge in the United exoskeleton: an individual whose appointment was due as much to his friendship with ex-colleague a fellow executive as any demonstrable skill. How wrong we all were. In brilliantly outmanoeuvring the club's celebrated head coach, as he outmanoeuvred the hapless a previous executive before him, he has proved himself as one of football's true generals: a tactical intellect of which United’s competitors are now rightly wary.

The Tactical Clash Regarding Formation & Philosophy

To illustrate, this was Jason Wilcox who having been part of the leadership that appointed the 3-4-3 fundamentalist the coach in the first place, played a key role in attempting to convince Amorim to abandon his favored formation. Naturally, these entreaties faced pushback. But perhaps such directives carry more weight when issued by a man of a man the impeccable football pedigree he possesses, holder of international appearances and a role in a championship team decades past.

Maybe eventually Jason Wilcox might agree to explain his thought processes publicly. Perhaps at some point he might be asked regarding why the coach is departing with full compensation, without any penalty clause activated. The director seldom speaks in public, for excellent reasons. The true intellectuals of this sport – men like Jason Wilcox – function at a level beyond our own prosaic understanding. If he ever did speak, most likely all we would hear would be high-frequency signals and four-dimensional whirring. Desiring an explanation is not quite the same as being ready to comprehend it.

The Ultimate Power Behind Command

But of course, by focusing our attention on Jason Wilcox we overlook the true genius behind the club's current leadership. The director is, in reality, merely executing the commands of his ultimate line manager Sir Jim Ratcliffe, who privately has emphasized his desire for a four-man defense. It is reported, the owner has also suggested playing Bryan Mbeumo as a right wing-back. The owner is eager for the club to adopt data science and analytics. According to ESPN, during a leadership summit soon after his minority ownership, he declared that United’s style of play “shall be determined in this room”.

After all, Sir Jim is an expert in this technical football matters, drawing from his previous experience in petrochemicals and yachting. Most importantly he is immensely wealthy, and it is known, the wealthy are the best of us: more perceptive, more wise, more tactically astute, fundamentally superior. Who else would you trust to manage an enlightened programme of austerity, the construction of a new stadium that looks similar to someone’s leftover knitting, the acquisition of Benjamin Sesko?

The New Football Hierarchy: Executives Over Managers

This is a trend we are increasingly seeing at the elite levels football. Historically, teams mistakenly delegated big footballing decisions to low-level employees like managers, talent spotters – even footballers. Maybe previously feasible for an up-and-coming, innovative manager with ideas and drive to go into a club and see their vision supported to fruition. But how many companies have such individuals established? How many mass redundancies have they managed? Far preferable to invest the real power where it rightly belongs: the leadership tier, the open-necked shirt brigade, the guys with the jaw-dropping LinkedIn profiles. It is wiser to decide the tactics by the directors and hire someone who can tailor their methods to suit. If managers were formerly chefs, they have become more akin to Deliveroo drivers: not really responsible for the product, yet finally accountable if it arrives poorly or fails of the box.

In the meantime, their job has become less about defining the vision and more about selling it: the front-facing representative on the front desk, the public face for a club they have minimal power to change. A coach at Chelsea takes a squad of literal children into Europe and secures domestic cups, and essentially is dismissed for talking. A manager at Celtic sees his reputation ruined while the people who appointed him live to blunder another day.

The Modern Corporate Football: Accountability for the Coaches

And perhaps on some microcosmic level this represents corporate governance in action: the rise of a gilded overclass who are infallible, whose decisions are always sacrosanct, whose errors can always be resolved by sacking without justification. Hire the system coach and then dismiss them for using too much 3-4-3. Bring in the project manager and then discard them for requiring excessive time. And most importantly be grateful; for the incremental increases in ticket costs, for your new summer signings, for the reality that the grownups – regardless of their expertise – remain in control.