🔗 Share this article

Only two days before the NYC mayoral election, Michael Lange issued a bold electoral prediction – going beyond the winner overall, and precinct by precinct. The analyst, a political analyst born and raised in the city, devoted over a decade in progressive politics and emerged as a kind of local celebrity recently for his thorough analyses into city data and polling.

He released his highly detailed prediction map – which correctly forecast that the progressive candidate would win while missing Andrew Cuomo’s solid showing – on his Substack, the Narrative War. Lange possesses a talent for clever terms. He pointed out, for instance, the divide between the “commie corridor”, running from one neighborhood to Bushwick to Astoria, where he predicted (accurately) that the left-wing candidate would win by huge margins, and the “capitalist corridor” on Manhattan’s Upper East and Upper West Sides. In those areas, certain media outlets and financial newspapers surpass the mainstream paper” in audience and the majority of electors favored Cuomo, campaigning as a moderate alternative.

Voting Day Trends and Unexpected Results

How was your night?

I had to do that since they were dropping around 200,000 votes into the tally every few minutes! I was actually a little nervous initially: Mamdani led the early vote by 12 points, but came large groups of votes that came in after that and the advantage dropped from 12% to 8%. I was worried.

Understand, there was a world where yesterday turned out kind of poorly for Mamdani, where the opponent was going to end up basically increasing his support from the Democratic primary. But Mamdani gained half a million supporters to his primary coalition, and this was critical why he succeeded. He went out and greatly broadened his base from the first round.

Expanding Support

Where did the mayor-elect get additional support from?

He built the coalition that progressives long aimed for: it’s multiracial, youthful, tenants and it’s people squeezed by affordability. He improved significantly with Black and Hispanic voters, everyday New Yorkers, compared to the earlier election. Plus he further maximized his core of liberal progressives, young leftists, and immigrant groups. He couldn’t have won without making those significant inroads.

He built the coalition that the left long aimed for: multiracial, young, renters and residents squeezed by affordability

There were also a number of Trump/Mamdani voters – is that a big trend?

It is a genuine phenomenon, confined to Hispanic laborers, Asian communities and Islamic voters. Electors in immigrant strongholds that went for Trump previously went for the progressive this year. But it’s not that he was winning over white working-class voters and Maga voters.

Voter Participation and Effects

One of the big stories of the election was the record turnout. Who did that help?

Each candidate. Turnout was significantly higher than I had expected. I thought we might exceed 2 million, but it’s closer to 2.3M – that is a lot of darn voters. There was a substantial opposition group, energized, but his supporters was equally driven, and that was enough to win.

You forecasted he’d get over 50% of the vote. Is he likely for that?

Currently it appears he’s favored to get over 50%. He has just over 50% but remain around 200,000 votes left to report as of Wednesday morning. Thus I don’t think it’s definitive, but I believe it’s likely, and I wish he achieves it so then no one can say Sliwa was a disruptor.

GOP Decline

The GOP candidate, the conservative contender, was another surprise. His vote plummeted.

He lost any district in any area. Not even Tottenville in Staten Island, which is like an 88% Trump area. That truly was unexpected. The independent kept Caucasian districts, affluent zones and devout communities, and plus gained all of these Republicans on the island who had a high participation. I believe occurred significant tactical voting by the Republicans. They were doing it before the former president endorsed for Cuomo, but it assisted. It could have even turned the tide unless the winning alliance hadn’t grown.

Progressive Strongholds

What about your much mentioned “commie corridor” – was support for Mamdani dominant in those areas of the boroughs?

In my view there was some weakening of the commie corridor in some areas like neighborhoods that have more older white ethnic folks. There, for example, the property owners and homeowners all went for Cuomo. Thus there was some opposition. However no, mostly the commie corridor is a key factor why Zohran won – he was polling between 77% and 83% in Fort Greene, Clinton Hill and Bushwick.

Jewish Voters

In the lead-up to the vote we reported on if Mamdani was making inroads with the community. Any indication that he did?

Exist areas with a lot of non-religious and left-inclined voters – such as specific locales – where he performed strongly. But in the affluent districts such as the Upper East Side, his Middle East stance was influential in those places. Similarly in the more middle-class Jewish areas like Forest Hills, Rego Park, or Bronx areas – they all leaned Cuomo. And also, you have newcomers from the former Soviet Union in southern Brooklyn, they were strongly supportive. So it’s unclear if there were crazy narrative-busters on this one, but he did hold more progressive Jewish neighborhoods and even parts of the another locale with large leads.

Long-Term Significance

Did Mamdani redefine what New York represents in politics? Will commie corridor serve as a springboard for progressive contenders?

Yes, it’s no coincidence that key figures from progressives hail from a few areas in Brooklyn, Queens and the Bronx. I’m sure that we’ll see more of that – candidates will emerge from these areas to be elevated nationally.

However I believe that each urban center in the US could develop similar progressive hubs. Cities are the centers of leftwing power in the nation – because they’re young, tenancy is common and they are places where individuals struggle by the inequalities exist.