🔗 Share this article

When the nation observed its 200th anniversary on July 4, 1976, the occasion was commemorated by the opening of the National Air and Space Museum's main building on Washington DC's National Mall. Conceived in a boldly modernist style, it served as a monument to American aeronautical achievements, spanning from the first flight to the moon landings.

At that time, despite the recent shadow of political shenanigans, there was a pervasive sense of a nation embracing progress and scientific puissance. Period recreations were present, yet the dominant narrative was firmly on the horizon and contemporary achievement.

“The one that people know mostly is the Arc de Triomphe in Paris, France. And we’re gonna top it by, I think, a lot.”

Now, half a century later, as preparations advance for the 250th anniversary, the architectural vision appears to have swung markedly toward historical re-enactment. Intent on imprinting a distinctly gilded signature on the capital, proposals for a victory arch to be erected near the Lincoln Memorial have been shared. Three uncredited versions of this structure, now termed the “Independence Arch,” showcase varying levels of gold leaf and statuary.

Given the well-known affinity for opulence, many anticipate the most gilded iteration to be favored. Critics have characterized the aesthetic as reminiscent of “provincial car dealership rococo.” All designs are modeled on the ancient Arch of Titus in Rome, a historical template repeated throughout history in arches like the Arc de Triomphe.

Size and Symbolism: A Measure for Every Year

Initial proposals floated three different sizes, but the largest option—standing at 250 feet tall—has reportedly been settled on. This “foot-per-year” symbolism is seen as perfectly aligning with the anniversary's themes. For context, this would substantially exceed the 164-foot height of Paris's Arc de Triomphe.

Historically, triumphal arches—especially immense ones—have been a magnet for authoritarian figures. Historical plans for similarly colossal arches in other capitals underscore this tradition of using monumental design to assert power and permanence.

Beyond the Arch: Currency and Combat

The monumental proposals are paired by other unconventional ideas for the semiquincentennial. These reportedly include:

• Commemorative Coins: Producing $1 coins bearing a living person's likeness, a move that would contravene a century-old law prohibiting such a practice.
• White House UFC Event: Staging a major mixed martial arts competition in a temporary arena on the White House's grounds, a prospect unprecedented for previous administrations.

These proposals have fueled a perception of an administration eager to blur the lines between official function and political pageantry.

Heritage Concerns: The Fate of the Kennedy Center

Another contentious proposal involves the potential redevelopment of the Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts, a landmark specimen of modern architecture. This has sparked significant opposition from preservation groups.

One such organization has publicly condemned the process, stating that the building is a “beloved cultural institution” and a “significant work of modern architecture.” They have voiced serious alarm over an “ongoing lack of adherence to established procedures” and emphasized that such public sites “must be stewarded transparently, not treated as private assets.”

Echoes of Rome

Through these endeavors, there is a clear effort to appropriate historical symbolism for current personal ends. Directives favoring “classical” architectural styles for federal buildings are seen by observers as a strategic move to consolidate control over civic design and marginalize modernist ideals.

While the proposed arch is marketed as a monument to national independence, its imposing scale and associated symbolism prompt historical reflection. It brings to mind the ancient practice of a servant whispering “Memento mori” to a victorious general—a admonition of transience and the passing nature of all power and glory.